1/3/2024 0 Comments Yoink or no yoink![]() Farflung and Yoink! introduction is preceded by “there’s only one way to handle outlaw bears.”.The way all the Mounties are surprised about their uniforms being stolen, it’s as Noof took the clothes off them while they were sleeping, eh.“No furs, no uniforms, eh.” So Yoink! gets fed up, calls the Home Shopping Channel, and orders new uniforms for the Mounties and tuxedos for the animals. The two battle Noof, but the fight escalates to where the RMH gets destroyed. When the Captain finds this out, he calls on Sergeant Farflung and Yoink! of the Yukon to get the uniforms back. This is revenge, eh, for the Mounties letting the Trappers take the fur off the Yukon animals. YOINK! OF THE YUKON ( Promo Link) ( Video Link)Īt the Royal Mountie Headquarters, Noof the Bear sneaks in at the middle of the night to take the Mountie’s uniforms, eh. Sadly these talents were not used on a better story, eh… Yoink! of the Yukon is the 15th What-A-Cartoon! and features Cadet Yoink!, an anthropomorphic (I think it’s a dog, don’t know, eh) and his human superior, Sergeant Farnsworth Farflung.Īll the voices are provided by Charlie Adler (Buster Bunny on Tiny Toons) and Rob Paulsen (Pinky on Pinky and the Brain). ![]() I plan to update it to a newer version soon and that update should bring in a bunch of new word senses for many words (or more accurately, lemma).Not much to say about this cartoon, but it’s interesting that we don’t have many cartoons set in Canada, eh? Special thanks to the contributors of the open-source code that was used in this project: the UBY project (mentioned above), and express.js.Ĭurrently, this is based on a version of wiktionary which is a few years old. I simply extracted the Wiktionary entries and threw them into this interface! So it took a little more work than expected, but I'm happy I kept at it after the first couple of blunders. The researchers have parsed the whole of Wiktionary and other sources, and compiled everything into a single unified resource. That's when I stumbled across the UBY project - an amazing project which needs more recognition. However, after a day's work wrangling it into a database I realised that there were far too many errors (especially with the part-of-speech tagging) for it to be viable for Word Type.įinally, I went back to Wiktionary - which I already knew about, but had been avoiding because it's not properly structured for parsing. This caused me to investigate the 1913 edition of Websters Dictionary - which is now in the public domain. I initially started with WordNet, but then realised that it was missing many types of words/lemma (determiners, pronouns, abbreviations, and many more). The dictionary is based on the amazing Wiktionary project by wikimedia. And since I already had a lot of the infrastructure in place from the other two sites, I figured it wouldn't be too much more work to get this up and running. I had an idea for a website that simply explains the word types of the words that you search for - just like a dictionary, but focussed on the part of speech of the words. ![]() Both of those projects are based around words, but have much grander goals. For those interested in a little info about this site: it's a side project that I developed while working on Describing Words and Related Words.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |